Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] PostgreSQL Becomes IBM's Darling After MySQL Takeover

  • Subject: [News] PostgreSQL Becomes IBM's Darling After MySQL Takeover
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:54:49 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Freelance
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
IBM Takes Stake in Open Source Database Vendor

,----[ Quote ]
| For more than a decade, PostgreSQL has been a cornerstone of the open source 
| database market. In recent years, EnterpriseDB has emerged as a leading 
| vendor supporting and driving PostgreSQL forward.  
`----

http://www.internetnews.com/software/article.php/3736336

IBM chips into EnterpriseDB love fund

http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2008/03/25/enterprisedb_ibm_investment_dev_updates/


Related:

PostgreSQL 8.3 Feature List

,----[ Quote ]
| The following list covers most, but not all, of the new features included in 
| version 8.3. As there are a large number of features, they have been grouped 
| by purpose and the descriptions kept brief. For more detail, see the 
| PostgreSQL documentation and release notes. For an even more compact format, 
| see the feature matrix (English only).    
`----

http://www.postgresql.org/about/press/features83


PostgreSQL or MySQL: Which is faster?

,----[ Quote ]
| It's easy to find benchmarks that favor one database over another,
| depending on the hardware, the configuration and the test. One database
| might do better on a single-core machine with little memory, while
| another can take better advantage of scaling to multiple core processors.
| One might lead on reads while another leads on writes.
| 
|     * This MySQL vs. Postgres demonstrates MySQL is faster.
|     * Benchw results shows PostgreSQL as being faster.
|     * The Windows Skills blog shows MySQL is faster. 
`----

http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid39_gci1252003,00.html


PostgreSQL 8.2 Closes The Gap  

,----[ Quote ]
| The release is an effort to close the gap on a performance and
| functionality basis between PostgreSQL and its competitive
| proprietary counterparts such as Oracle, IBM's DB2 and Microsoft's
| SQL Server.
`----

http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3647376


PostgreSQL vs. SQL Server, Oracle: Enterprise-ready and able to compete

,----[ Quote ]
| Why are you paying so much in licensing costs and annual maintenance when
| you could use PostgreSQL for free, and get community support and upgrades
| for free as well? This is the question that Neil Matthew and Richard
| Stones pose to smaller companies regarding their less critical
| applications.
`----

http://searchopensource.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid39_gci1222466,00.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index