Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] [Rival] MSBBC Busted by Parliament for the MS iPlayer Scam

____/ Mark Kent on Thursday 17 January 2008 18:11 : \____

> Jim Richardson <warlock@xxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:12:23 +0000,
>>  Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Jim Richardson <warlock@xxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:06:18 +0000,
>>>>  Kier <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:08:33 +0000, Mark Kent wrote:
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>> Does Kier work for the BBC?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is Mark an idiot or just round the bend?
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course I don't work for the BBC, you loon! I have in fact stated
>>>>> several times on various posts what I do for a living, and is has zero to
>>>>> do with the BBC or MS.
>>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> Mark has issues.
>>>> 
>>>
>>> Can't see what was wrong with that question, myself.  It is perfectly
>>> reasonable.  For kier, and yourself, to react in that way indicates
>>> where the issues are - they are obviously not with me.
>>>
>>> Clearly, the answer to this question is either "yes" or "no".  Neither
>>> you, nor Kier, seem able to achieve this.  Instead, you are trolling,
>>> Jim.  Now, why would you be trolling me?
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> Kier clearly stated that he *doesn't* work for the BBC, you even quoted
>> him saying so in the above section. Do you even read the posts you reply
>> to ?
>> 
> 
> He stated that after I asked it, but not before a stack of abuse, as you
> can see.  If you can explain to me how asking Kier if  he works for the
> BBC shows that I "have issues", then I'll consider your explanation.  It
> still looks a lot like trolling to me.
> 
> I don't expect you to be able to explain why he was abusive - I know the
> answer, he's trolling for a response.  He is a troll, plain and simple,
> as is proven above.

No, he is not a troll. His doubt makes an opportunity for debate that
encourages exposing and putting forward further evidence. Whether it convinces
him or not remains irrelevant to other people who witness the same evidence.
Whether you should bury the hatchet (kf) or not is up to you. If you don't
like troll-feeding, then you can set the kf to suit your reading preferences,
but what doesn't suit your scope doesn't make the divide between "troll"
and "not troll" for everyone else. The word troll is very offensive because
it's usually ascribed to the Earth's scum (people like Gary Stewart, Scott
Douglas, Ray Lopez, Bill Weisgerber and others).

-- 
                ~~ Best of wishes

A computer is like air conditioning: it becomes useless when you open windows.

                                                 ~Linus Torvalds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index