Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Op-ed: Microsoft Has Just Lost the Standards War

Microsoft wins this OOXML battle, but loses the war

,----[ Quote ]
| There is a two-month period for appeals before the ISO pronounces OOXML a 
| standard, and it's already obvious that there will be some. Members of the 
| Norwegian national standards committee, for instance, have already petitioned 
| the government to investigate how the country came to register a "yes" vote 
| on the draft standard when a majority of committee members were against it.    
| 
| I wrote a while ago about the disruption of the national process in Great 
| Britain, and an appeal is promised there, as well. And I'm sure the list will 
| grow: The New York Times this week also numbered Malaysia and Germany among 
| countries where protests are rising.   
| 
| I'm sitting here wondering, what has Microsoft won? Not much, as far as I can 
| tell. 
| 
| Its OOXML victory – if it turns out to be one after the appeals are heard – 
| will certainly be won at the cost of huge damage to its credibility. 
| Evidently, even while Microsoft was promising interoperability and openness 
| it was actively subverting the primary interoperability vehicle of the 
| international computing community: the standards-setting process.    
| 
| [...]
| 
| Even if Microsoft has managed to buy enough votes to get OOXML approved, and 
| bullies enough of the protestors into silence to make it stick, it still 
| hasn't created a standard. At most it's created the very real possibility 
| that it will be back in front of Neelie Kroes, the EU's commissioner for 
| competition, shelling out another billion euros in fines.    
`----

http://blogs.computerworld.com/microsoft_loses_on_ooxml

Comments from Canada (damaging to Microsoft):

,----[ Quote ]
| Canada voted to "Disapprove with Comments". Canada was among 10 countries 
| that expressed concern with the Fast Track of ISO/IEC DIS 29500. 
`----

http://www.scc.ca/en/news_events/news/newsdetails2_508.shtml


Related:

EU Initiates Investigation Against Microsoft OOXML Push

,----[ Quote ]
| But with Steve Ballmer taking over as CEO, there was supposed to be a kinder, 
| gentler Microsoft - one that would play nicely with its competitors.  When 
| antitrust regulators in turn challenged this new Microsoft, it issued not 
| challenges to fight to the end to prove that it had done nothing illegal, but 
| statements promising to "cooperate fully." 
`----

http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20080208082501776


EU Commission Investigating Microsoft's MSOOXML Push

,----[ Quote ]
| I hope they think to investigate the smear campaigns that seem to always 
| happen to anyone on the other side from Microsoft. What happened to Peter 
| Quinn was by no means unique.  
`----

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080208151410252


Corrupt countries were more likely to support the OOXML document format

,----[ Quote ]
| Is this just a random coincidence? The median of the CPI index of the above 
| mentioned 70 countries is 3.95. Of the most corrupted half (CPI index less 
| than 3.95) 23 or 77% voted for approval (approval or approval with comments) 
| and 7 or 23% for disapproval; 5 abstained. Of the least corrupted half (CPI 
| index more than 3.95) 13 or 54% voted for approval and 11 or 46% voted for 
| disapproval; 11 abstained - see the table below.      
`----

http://www.effi.org/blog/kai-2007-09-05.en.html


Microsoft accused of more OOXML standards fiddling 

,----[ Quote ]
| However the 11 new countries are refusing to say how they will vote. These 
| include Cote d'Ivoire, Cyprus, Ecuador, Jamaica, Lebanon, Malta, Pakistan, 
| Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey, Uruguay and Venezuela. Most people seem to think 
| that these have been put there by Vole to make sure the standard gets pushed 
| through.    
`----

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=42106

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index