Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Atheros Driver Dispute and Muddying of the Water

  • Subject: [News] Atheros Driver Dispute and Muddying of the Water
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:36:42 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
Continued Atheros Discussions

,----[ Quote ]
| Disagreement continued as to whether or not the BSD license allows the 
| addition of new copyrights on unmodified or minimally modified code. Another 
| disagreement was over the continued existence of improperly licensed files in 
| developer source code repository histories from when BSD licensed files had 
| been changed to the GPL, a problem since fixed.    
`----

http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Continued_Atheros_Discussions

Some believe that Theo plays for Microsoft (against Linux or the GPL).


Related:

SFLC on Atheros Driver Issue

,----[ Quote ]
| Let me therefore point out one last time that if the threats of litigation 
| and bluster about crime and malpractice--none of which has the slightest 
| basis in fact or law--were withdrawn, we would be able to resume detailed 
| communication with everyone who has a stake in the outcome.   
`----

http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/SFLC_on_Atheros_Driver_Issue
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2007/9/16/261061


Atheros Driver Developments

http://kerneltrap.org/OpenBSD/Atheros_Driver_Developments


Relicensing: what's legal and what's right

,----[ Quote ]
| In the end, distributing versions of the ath5k driver under GPLv2 (with the 
| requisite copyright attributions maintained) is something which the Linux 
| community is entitled to do. Anybody who does not like more restrictive 
| conditions being applied to BSD-licensed code is well advised to avoid using 
| the BSD license to begin with. But the legal ability to do something does not 
| make that something the right course of action. Only the developers who have 
| worked on the ath5k driver have the right to decide which license they will 
| use, but it's worth saying that allowing the BSD community to make use of 
| work done on the ath5k driver would be a friendly gesture and an 
| acknowledgment of the value of the code we got from them. The benefits from 
| such an act would likely outweigh any cost associated with allowing unwanted 
| proprietary use of the code which has been added to this driver.           
`----

http://lwn.net/Articles/247872/


Open Source coders caught stealing Open Source code 

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38746


GPL-BSD stoush: de Raadt hints at legal action 

http://www.itwire.com/content/view/14447/1091/

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index