On Wed, 02 May 2007 07:56:17 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> __/ [ AB ] on Wednesday 02 May 2007 06:58 \__
>
>> On 2007-05-02, Jim Richardson <warlock@xxxxxxxxxx> claimed:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 02 May 2007 05:10:58 +0100,
>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>> Thank you, Jim. I was thinking the same thing. He has shown nothing but
>>>> comtempt while I believe I have been polite to him all along.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, he's been pretty quiet on this. He's quick to criticize, and very
>>> slow to apologize for false accusations.
>>
>> Or admit when he's wrong. Or stop repeating the same falsehoods when
>> his falsehoods have been previously exposed. Or answer questions when
>> he gets himself into a corner.
>
> I have been waiting for an answer for several days:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/094c2e450c9725eb
>
> He lost the argument, so he ran away. I even asked him *again* to respond,
> but nothing... he was gone.
What are you talking about? You post a link to a story that's even more
irrelevant and you claim this is some kind of response? Try discussing the
original article you linked to, and the topic you wrote.
|
|
