Tim Smith wrote:
> In article <f5j6cs$qf8$03$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Peter Kohlmann <peter.koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > But what spot would you have if the stats were compiled with a
>> > legitimate program?
>> >
>>
>> Feel free to prove the non-legitimacy of the program now, Erik Hadron
>
> The authors have admitted to making the stats come out the way they
> want, rather than the way the data says they should come out, which is
> the definition of an illegitimate stats program.
>
Nope, that is not the "definition of an illegitimate stats program"
*You* declare it is "illegitimate"
The authors have described how the stats are made.
What you think is "illegitimate" about that is irrelevant, Erik Hadron
--
There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots.
|
|
