On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 18:16:19 +0000 (UTC), waterskidoo wrote:
> You guys are cherry picking posts to suit your
> POV.
We don't have to cherry pick, he does crap all the time.
How about the time he got caught pirating images for his blog? And, when
caught, refused to take it down, even after the artist himself asked him to
do so.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/e8c5347cf29e598a/cca760d8ed09213e
> It looks like he was overzealous in the initial
> numbers that he claimed.
Overzealous? Are you kidding me? There was no data to support his claim
*AT ALL*.
> In the scheme of things I feel Roy's massive number of
> good posts far outshine the marginal ones.
> Nobody is perfect.
If they were simply marginal, that would be one thing. Being outright
lies, distortions, etc is another.
What you're displaying is a classic case of situational ethics. Look it
up.
|
|
