On Feb 18, 9:40 am, "cc" <scatnu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Feb 17, 7:04 pm, AB <fardblos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 2007-02-17, Erik Funkenbusch <e...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> claimed:
>
> > > On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 22:06:34 +0000, Kier wrote:
>
> > >>> You want a list?
>
> > >>> 1) He fraudulently alters article titles and summaries.
>
> > >> Opinions/interpretations are not fraud. They may be poorly thought out or
> > >> inaccurate, but they cannot be considered fraud.
>
> > > No, he does it on purpose. He's been corrected, and he continues to use
> > > them. That's fraudulent.
>
> > Corrected* by whom? You? He says you're killfiled. How is he receiving
> > his "correction"?
>
> > * Assuming your explanation of "fraud" is accurate. I don't always
> > agree. But either way, there's still the little problem of his being
> > made aware.
>
> Fraud? I don't know, he says it's unintentional. I do know he says
> he's killfiled me, but responds directly to me from time to time(even
> very recently about WoW on Linux).
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2fe19773a22...
>
> He fails to respond to corrections there, but does in another thread.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/a1331819eba...
>
> Notice the rambling following no explaination of why he doesn't just
> put the title of the article quoted in the subject. There are a bunch
> of instances of him being corrected, and admitting it, and then
> repeating the same news item. If you want links to those I'd be happy
> to oblige as the rest of you seem unable to do a simple web search to
> find the truth. Not to mention the originals are included in that
> stupid fucking news digest. I guess that's not much of a problem
> though, because I'm sure no one reads those.
Roy is way cool. He is living Chaos theory.
|
|
