Roy Schestowitz schreef:
> ____/ ml2mst on Saturday 01 December 2007 23:18 : \____
>
>> Kier wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 20:59:04 +0100, Hadron wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> You find nothing wrong in his posting about his Gay love affairs to a
>> What Gay love affairs? You seem to be better informed then I am.
>>
>> A 23 year during monogamous relationship can hardly be called an affair.
>>
>>> In a flip way, in response to trolling sneers directed at him . God, you
>>> are such a useless, bigoted, cowardly twit.
>> Exactly, those where totally made up nasty shrifts, hoping that the
>> troll was that much discussed that he would plonk me and so I could get
>> rid of him.
>>
>> The problem with colatrolls is that they only see what they want to see,
>> the rest is ignored.
>>
>> They mix up lies with the truth to confuse and to cause as much damage
>> as possible.
>>
>> Excluding the so called "feeders", the real trolls on the colatrolls
>> list are a bunch of cockroaches. Their motto isn't any longer "Where
>> would you go today", but "what Linux advocate will we torture today".
>
> Filter them away. It'll prune the garbage out of COLA and leave you with the
> substance, I don't see trolls posts, except for cases where people reply to
> them and quote them too.
Indeed I have them all filtered out by now. As you can see, I'm not any
longer able to directly respond to the cockroach, because they are
filtered out. If I respond to their lies and totally made up nonsense.
It's because somebody previously quoted their crap.
> 3 or 4 COLA trolls appear to be currently active in Digg.com, so I added them
> to the blocklist. Again, it gets messy when people reply to the trolls. The
> UNIX/Linux was gradually abandoned when the trolls left a mess. Don't ask me.
> Ask others who used to participate there and left to spend their time
> elsewhere (FSDaily has not been infected by Microsoft shills yet, unlike Digg
> and even Slashdot, for example, where scum like Erik has been shilling for 10
> years under an account he refuses to name).
Yup I'm aware of the facts. I lurk COLA on a daily base, but most of the
time I beware of responding.
Isn't it ridiculous. I'm a devoted GNU/Linux user for almost a decade
and we have this interesting group called comp.os.linux.advocacy. But
you have to be very careful about what you write or else it will be used
against you and even worst against fellow GNU/Linux enthusiasts.
> But surely... Microsoft doesn't have shills. It calls them advertisers,
> evangelists, and all sort of other things.
>
> Worry not. Kroes et al are on the case.
>
> EU cracks down on fake blogger astroturfing
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | But back to the web, and with sneaky marketing campaigns likely to be more
> | effective than upfront marketing campaigns, what is stopping companies from
> | simply risking it and continuing existing practices?
> `----
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/03/eu_flogging_ban/
>
Interesting ;-)
>
> Microsoft's admission of shilling:
>
> http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/3000/PX03096.pdf
O darn, I've neglected slated.org this week and I haven't read "Do no
evil Saturday" yet.
Thanks for the interesting links, it's gonna be a looooong night ;-)
Snipped the rest.
Cheers
--
|_|0|_| Marti T. van Lin
|_|_|0| http://ml2mst.googlepages.com
|0|0|0| http://osgeex.blogspot.com
|
|
