"dapunka" <dapunka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1187202707.955302.291080@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On 15 Aug, 19:18, Tim Smith <reply_in_gr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 2007-08-15, Hadron <hadronqu...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > Google ads no less. My, my.
>>
>> Even better--Google ads that often promote things favorable to Novell.
>> Considering how often he's complained about Linux sites that use ad
>> services that include anti-Linux ads in the rotation, it's funny that he
>> doesn't keep his own site's ads clean.
>
> I'm asking this because of interest, and from a position of ignorance.
> Am I right in thinking that Google places ads for Novell on Roy's
> boycottnovell.com site because Novell is mentioned in the URL and also
> frequently in the content? And if this is the case, is there any way
> in which a site owner could get Google to stop this? That is assuming
> the site owner wants to continue carrying Google ads.
>
The point is that Roy gets on his high horse and criticises anyone, everyone
and every website where they take add revenue instead of pursuing some sort
of religous zealot ideal.
Yet when it comes to him making the almighty buck... it's a completely
different story. It doesn't matter if the adds that run conflict with his
personal beliefs. It's all okay as long as he gets his add revenue.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
