Maverick <Sun@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>> On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 15:25:38 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Open source SplendidCRM a sweet alternative for ".Net-centric" SAAS provider
>>>
>>>,----[ Quote ]
>>>| Now that he's gained some practical experience with an open source
>>>| application, Schepis says he'd use it again. "So long as there's
>>>| existing knowledge, or an easy way to get up to speed, there's no
>>>| difference between using open source and commercial. Actually, there's
>>>| an additional benefit, because you have access to the source and
>>>| the licensing fees are much lower. Just make sure you set your
>>>| expectations in line with the experience level of the people who
>>>| are going to implement it for you."
>>>`----
>>>
>>>http://www.itmanagersjournal.com/feature/22363
>>
>>
>> You are such a fucking liar, Roy. Jesus.
>>
>> The entire article is about how the PHP based SugarCRM wouldn't work for
>> them, so instead they went with a SplendidCRM which *IS* a .NET based
>> product.
>
> According to the title it isn't. If it is as you say it is, then the
> article misled, not Roy. According to the article title, which isn't
> Roys, it claims that SplendidCRM is open source. But of course deeper
> into the article it is ".NET-centric". It doesn't say it is developed
> with ".NET"... just that it is oriented towards the MS platform.
Which begs the question - Why the fsck is Roybot spamming this NG with
articles he has no idea about?
--
They are most deceived that trusteth most in themselves.
|
|
