On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:02:43 +0200, Dominique wrote:
> Le Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:57:08 +0100, Milan Babuskov a écrit :
>
>> Roy.Schestowitz@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> they both suck
>>
>> That doesn't sound like a "difference" to me?
>>
>> If you want to learn about real difference, read here:
>>
>> http://swoes.blogspot.com/2006/07/kde-vs-gnome.html
> That's true at both sucks.
> gnome have less bugs as kde, but kde have more possibilities of settings.
>
> As example, I will never use gnome because I just cannot configure the
> mouse to work as I want it. And I don't use kde anymore because I don't
> like to have to fight against undocumented features in order to get things
> to work the way I like it.
>
> It you want an outstanding wm with infinite and well documented features,
> look for fvwm. If you want more as a wm, a DE (desktop environement), look
> for fvwm-crystal.
>
> If you have the patience to learn it (fvwm-crystal is
> fvwm, but much more easier to learn because it just work from the first
> run and have a modular configuration), I am sure at you will like it and
> look at gnome and kde with a little smile on your face.
>
> Dominique
The current KDE 3.5.5 is very bug-free and you really don't have to
"learn" it. Just choose a distro that installs it as default. I run both
GNOME and KDE apps on KDE with no problems or quirks.
--
#1 Offishul Ruiner of Usenet, March 2007
#1 Usenet Asshole, March 2007
#1 Bartlo Pset, March 13-24 2007
#10 Most hated Usenetizen of all time
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2004
COOSN-266-06-25794
|
|
