On 2006-09-05, Hadron Quark <qadronhuark@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "[H]omer" <spam@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Linonut wrote:
>>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/09/msg00002.html
>>
>> Schilling was always a bit of an arrogant prick, IMHO, and a Solaris
>> fanboy to boot. Red Hat forked away from his CDDL crap a while ago,
>> and went with "Cdrecord-Clone" with DVD extensions (something else he
>> bitched about).
>>
>> .----
>> | Both RedHat and SuSE publish bastardized and defective variants of
>> | cdrtools in their distributions.
>> |
>> | If you have problems on RedHat or SuSE systems, first fetch a recent
>> | original cdrtools source, compile it yourself and run the original
>> | instead of broken software that illegally claims to be cdrecord.
>> `----
>>
>> - http://tinyurl.com/p2tgj (archived cdrecord.berlios.de)
>>
>> Hey, that's why they call it "Open" Source, pal.
>
> It does seem like a recurring theme though. Even Stallman reckons most
> OSS projects have crap documentation and developers need to pull their
> thumbs out of their asses and improve it.
The versions of cdrecord that Jorg didn't try to extract profit
out of have always been pretty trivial to use actually. GUI wrappers
have also been robust and plentiful.
[deletia]
--
Apple: because TRANS.TBL is an mp3 file. It really is! |||
/ | \
|
|
