On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 17:53:44 +0200, Hadron Quark wrote:
> flatfish+++ <flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 16:45:24 +0200, Hadron Quark wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> ps can you define shill for me please. Apparently I'm an MS shill. Even
>>> though I use Ubuntu.
>>
>> Shill= Mark Kent, William Poster..
>>
>> They post useless *met too* replies to Roy's News messages to boost the
>> reply count because people were noticing that Roy's posts rarely spark
>> conversation.
>
> I'd noticed that the only replies were from Mark. Bill Boaster, I hadnt
> noticed since he only ever posts are "me too" boasts about the
> effectiveness of his "leafnode" and "killfilter". If ever there was a
> good example of a little knowledge being a dangerous thing, then Boaster
> is it. Between him and Greg "all Linux kernels are the same" Shearman,
> its a toss up for the most inept.
I would say that Peter Kohlmann belongs in the technically inept group as
well.
Notice how he is thread slinking this post he made:
************************************************************************
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/42c20cfa7ca49dae
Over here he accuses you of rigging the screenshots by turning of
anti-aliasing:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/82e012c465a...
"You mean, you deliberately selected different fonts/fontsizes?
And deselected Anti-aliasing too for KDE?
Figures, after all you are one of the most dishonest widiots around here"
Yet over here, he claims anti-aliasing has no effect on screen shots:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/628d7bbe0fe...
" BTW, it is so simple to test for yourself.
Do a screen-shot of a text. Now disable anti-aliasing
Do again screen-shot of same text.
Compare both. They are exactly the same"
Kohlmann once again proves his technical ineptness.
***********************************************************************
|
|
