On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:08:09 -0600, Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:52:27 +0000, Doug Mentohl wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:32:22 -0600, Erik FunkenLawyer wrote:
>>
>>> What's odd is that the appleas court appears
>>> to have completely misunderstood the GPL.
>>
>>> From the ruling:
>>
>> The bit you left out :)
>>
>> "People may make and distribute derivative works if and only if they
>> come under the same license terms as the original work."
>
> That part is relevant.
>
>>> "Thus the GPL propagates from user to user and
>>> revision to revision: neither the original author, nor any
>>> creator of a revised or improved version, may charge for the
>>> software or allow any successor to charge."
>>
>> You can charge for distributing the software, it's in the GPL.
>
> Tell that to the Appeals court, then.
>
>> "Authors who distribute their works under this license .. authorize
>> not only copying but also .. prohibits charging for the derivative
>> work"
>
> Case in point.
>
>> Spoken like a true neo fachist. Now lets all stand and sing to der
>> Fatherland .. Deutschland, Deutschland Ãber alles, Ãber alles in der
>> Welt ...
>
> Could you be more racist and insulting? I doubt it.
I think Doug Mentohl is off his meds again.
He does seem to go through these cycles.
Get ready for him to accuse someone of stalking him and then he will
disappear for a while.
|
|
