"Larry Qualig" <lqualig@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> Treachery In The Trenches
>>
>
> <snip>
>
> How in the world did you determine that this was written by Ken Starks?
> It's a blog entry from someone named "Helios" and was even signed with
> a ' h '.
>
> Furthermore this Helios guy is a looney tune...
>
> <quote>
> Personally, I would rather open a thousand razor wounds on my body then
> embrace a leper than spend another dime or moment on Novell ventures. I
> would rather eat a bowl of broken windshield glass with vinegar and
> salt as condiments than give Novell anything but contemptuous
> consideration.
> </quote>
>
>
> Then there's the title of your thread -"Ken Starks on Novell's Sin" ...
> SIN???? What SIN????
>
> You do realize that we're only talking about a computer program and
> *NOT* a religion. What sort of idiot are you?
>
Check this out - so indicative of ZERO understanding of how real
companies who are there to make a profit work:
,----
| The customer is only along for the ride and has to take all the wrong
| turns with the driver. To those of you who post opinions that we are a
| gaggle of Chicken Littles and are busy dodging pieces of the falling
| sky:
`----
And he sets himself as judge and jury : could almost be Mark Kent:
,----
| Yeah, I have read all of the pro's and con's of the deal. I understand,
| given the snippets of the agreement we have been offered, how this may
| benefit Linux. I have noted the numerous blogs and articles decrying the
| agreement and the possible ramifications therein. I have heard from
| those who see it as harmful to the Open Source Community, and I have
| read those who take any opportunity to deride those thinking this is
| harmful.
`----
"I" anyone?
,----
| And the mothership just crapped on you and left without leaving an
| note. Let it be stated as well, while stripping you of your identity
| within that special community. They did what they did without any
| thought to you or your dignity.
`----
Mad as a hatter.
|
|
