__/ [ Paul B ] on Wednesday 17 May 2006 14:32 \__
> On Wed, 17 May 2006 14:07:50 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>__/ [ "Pet @ www.gymratz.co.uk ;¬)" ] on Wednesday 17 May 2006 14:02 \__
>>
>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>> I thought this would be of interest to some:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/indexing-timeline/
>>>>
>>>> Very long post. Here is a snippet.
>>>>
>>>> ,----[ Snippet ]
>>>> | Fair enough. Some people don't want to read the whole mind-numbingly
>>>> | long post while their eyes glaze over. For those people, my short
>>>> | summary would be two-fold. First, I believe the crawl/index team
>>>> | certainly has enough machines to do its job, and we definitely
>>>> | aren't dropping documents because we're "out of space."
>>>> `----
>>>
>>> I'm still of the opinion it's a money generating issue.
>>> After all, when lots of sites are getting dropped from high ranking
>>> SEO'd positions which provide zero revenue to Google are now having to
>>> resort to Adwords to regain their share of the business.
>>
>>
>>I very much doubt it. See comments below.
>
> I would go further on that and say no. period.
*nod* But I prefer to avoid one-word answers and innane one-liners (no
offence intended). Frankly, some of Bill's recent posts have added so little
information that they were worth pruning in the news client. I wonder it
it's just me... again, no offence intended.
Best wishes,
Roy
--
Roy S. Schestowitz | Useless fact: Women blink twice as much as men
http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE Linux ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
3:20pm up 19 days 22:17, 9 users, load average: 1.39, 0.60, 0.29
http://iuron.com - Open Source knowledge engine project
|
|
