This message was posted on Usenet, NOT JLAforums, & on Tue, 13 Jun 2006
18:20:25 +0000, Sinister Midget posted this:
> On 2006-06-13, William Poaster <wp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted something concerning:
>> This message was posted on Usenet, NOT JLAforums, & on Tue, 13 Jun 2006
>> 17:42:26 +0000, Sinister Midget posted this:
>>
>>> On 2006-06-13, Edwards <edwards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted something concerning:
>>>> On 2006-06-13, Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> I wouldn't have a problem with his posts if he:
>>>
>>>> Learn to use a killfile, or call someone a criminal without evidence.
>>>> Tough choice, that.
>>>
>>> Erik's main concern is his FUD and lies being drown out. He can't
>>> killfile or he won't know how hard he has to work.
>>>
>>> He's trying not to work hard anyway. He's hoping he can get Roy
>>> dismissed and the postings will stop. It hasn't worked. It isn't
>>> _going_ to work.
>>
>> No it isn't. And, BTW, do you happen to know if Ewik's answered these
>> questions yet:
>>
>> 1] Where does NTFS store its journal?
>>
>> 2] How did the Morris worm spread by email?
>>
>> 3] What about using MS TT fonts on Linux?
>>
>> 4]Can he provide evidence for plenty of examples of competing ISO
>> standards?
>>
>> 5] Why is ok for him (without asking permission) to publicize other
>> people's personal information, but if a person chooses to
>> publicize personal information about *himself*, it is "inappropriate".
>
> No, I don't know that he's answered them. Quite the contrary. He's
> working hard to /not/ answer any of them.
>
>> The list of unanswered questions is growing, but "Ewik The Weasel" will
>> probably ignore it.
>
> Don't forget hos "thousands of root exploits per month" that later
> turned out to be a "rough guess" based on making it all up.
>
> He's added 2 more that I can name right off the top of my head:
>
> 1. How does he know Roy didn't come by the picture he's ranting about
> honestly?
>
> 2. How does he know that Roy does /not/ have the legitimate right to
> use the picture despite what the copyright owner claims is the case?
I shall add them to the list. Ay thenk-yew! ;-)
--
www.jlaforums.com steals usenet newsgroup posts, & misleads the public
into thinking the posts come from their own forums. THEY DON'T!
This post was originally posted in a USENET newsgroup.
USENET is free to anyone with a newsreader.
|
|
