On 2006-12-31, Roy Culley <mrloy@xxxxxxxxx> posted something concerning:
> begin risky.vbs
> <i6tk64-abv.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Sinister Midget <phydeaux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> On 2006-12-31, Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted something concerning:
>>
>>> Once again Roy is in flagrant disregard of copyright, and is doing
>>> so in more than one way.
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>
>> Did you get permission to reproduce that? Is this "your own
>> personal, non-commercial use" or are you doing this on behalf of
>> someone or some thing that brings monetary renumeration to you?
>
> Nice one Sinister. If, and its a huge if, Erik had any credibility
> left in anyones eyes he's lost it now. These personal attacks against
> Roy are truly pathetic.
>
>>> So let's review the violations, shall we?
>>
>> 1) Erik violated that which he wants to accuse others of violating.
>
> 2006 will go down as the year Erik made a complete and utter laughing
> stock out of himself. I was going to say its all downhill from here
> Erik but you are already at rock bottom.
I think 2006 will go down as the year Erik's pathetic state became
most evident. I don't think it didn't exist prior. I just htink it was
better hidden.
--
You can make things foolproof, but not idiot-proof because
idiots are so ingenious.
|
|
